Fairy Tales 2010

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Brother as bird: Somewhere in between?

In consideration of the other stories that we have read, I believe that it can not be definitively said whether the boy from The Juniper Tree is totally anything on a scale between totally human and totally animal. The brothers from other stories were shown to be transformed as a result of some form of curse while the brother from the Juniper Tree transformed from the bare minimal remains of his body. But would that necessarily be considered a transformation? Or would that be a resurrection? In the other stories, the brothers were alive and then became birds, which I believe signifies a transformation. In the Juniper Tree, the brother is alive, then is killed, goes from inanimate to animate in his resurrection from his own bones to a new bird, and then finally transforms back to the brother after an eye for an eye event. Due to the incorporation of the resurrection stage of the brother's cycle in the Juniper Tree, I believe any definitiveness of his being is lost and his being can not be measured in the totality of anything. Thus I propose that the brother is somewhere in between. The bird is personified when he is able to 1) sing, 2) hold a conversation with the people that he encounters, and 3) comprise a plan of 'vengeance' and act it out. At the very least, I would say that the boy is more bird than human. This is due to the fact that the boy re-enters the world of the living or becomes animate, first as a bird and then is transformed to a human boy later. Some may say that birds can sing, but this birds lyrics consist of personal account, showing that he can not be totally bird. The fact that he remembers and sings about the activities that occurred after his death and before his resurrection, implicates that he is something of higher being and not just totally a bird or totally a human.

3 comments:

  1. I must admit that I am slightly confused by your account. From what I understand, you claim that the boy is more bird than human, but all of your explanation is about how he is indeed quite human. As far as I can tell, the only birdly quality you ascribe to the boy is his physical form as a bird. Is there some further explanation, or is it simply that you are putting more weight towards the physical body than the actions/abilities of the boy once transfigured?
    I do not see the relevance of the order of his transformations as such either...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm putting more weight towards death. In other stories, the living transformed into another living thing. In The Juniper Tree this was obviously different so I feel that there should be some underlying difference. I feel that there must be more meaning to him coming back as a bird rather than just to sing a song. I think that he is more bird than human because of the way he is brought back to life. If he started off as a bird in the first place and then transformed into a human, would he be considered more human and bird and what would the answer be based off of? Just considering the fact that life was created more so than a transformation so the bird being able to talk and remember things that happened while the boy was dead would probably mean that he isn't human...maybe?

    ReplyDelete