In "The Singing Rose," the father tells his daughters to "go out into the wide world, and the one of you who brings back a singing rose shall inherit my throne, and she shall be queen over the entire land." The daughter that does receive the rose must return to the beast's castle in 7 years. Again, it is ultimately the father's fault for her stay with the beast. Although he hands her over "with a bleeding heart," he does still hand her over. However, unlike the narrator of Carter's story, "Day after day she sorrowfully thought about her father and her sisters" and takes every possible opportunity to return home.
In Disney's "Beauty and the Beast," Belle makes the conscious choice to take her father's place and live with the beast forever. Their familial love is so strong that she is completely willing to make this sacrifice. It is still the father's fault, although it is the daughter's decision. The main reason for her initial sorrow with the beast is the fact that he does not allow her to say good-bye to her beloved father. In the climax of the beast's love for Belle, he allows her to return home to her father, this being the greatest gift he could offer.
The father is always the catalyst for Belle's meeting with the beast. However, his role after this encounter depends entirely on the reason behind his catalyst and, consequently, on the familial bond between father and daughter.
I agree with all the examples that you give here. The one exception is in the story "The Pig King", but there the emphasis is on the Beast figure as opposed to the Beauty figure in the story so it doesn't make too much of an impact. I think that the reason the father is so consistently seen as causing the beloved daughter to go to the Beast is because, in 17th and 18th century culture, he did. Assuming these stories stand as allegories for arranged marriages, the father is the one controlling the union so it is natural that the father causes the meeting and subsequent actions between Beauty and the Beast.
ReplyDelete